ssues relating to corruption in international arbitration come under scrutiny in the latest supplement to the ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin – ICC’s essential resource for dispute resolution practitioners and scholars worldwide.
Entitled Tackling Corruption in Arbitration, the supplement features three in-depth articles and extensive extracts from previously unpublished arbitral awards rendered between 2001 and 2009 in cases administered by the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (the Court). The awards provide illustrations of situations in which arbitral tribunals have or have not found evidence of corruption, the criteria on which such findings were based and the remedies applied.
“One of the greatest challenges for arbitrators is how to obtain and assess evidence of practices that are inherently secret,” said Court Secretary General Andrea Carlevaris, in a foreword to the new publication. Mr Carlevaris expresses the hope that, by providing practical examples of how arbitrators have approached the key questions of standard of proof and circumstantial evidence, the supplement will make a useful contribution to the continuing fight against corruption.
In an article entitled Using Red Flags to Prevent Arbitration from Becoming a Safe Harbour for Contracts that Disguise Corruption, Vladimir Khvalei, head of Baker & McKenzie’s CIS Dispute Resolution Practice in Moscow and a Vice-President of the Court, alerts arbitrators to the kinds of circumstances that may point to the existence of corruption in a business deal. “Disputes arising from such deals are often referred to arbitration in the belief that arbitration is less likely to expose the true nature of their dealings than if the dispute were referred to the courts,” Mr Khvalei said. He proposes practical checklists to help identify circumstances that may point to, confirm or disprove suspicions of corruption.
In concluding their review of ICC experience of dealing with corruption in arbitration, Managing Counsel of the Court Christian Albanesi, and General Counsel of the Court and ICC Emmanuel Jolivet, note: “ICC has confirmed its uncompromising opposition to corruption and bribery as unacceptable impediments to the development of international trade. If there is more talk about corruption in arbitration now than ever before, it should not be thought to reflect an upsurge in the number of cases involving corruption, but rather the increasing tendency of arbitrators, parties and even third parties to raise the issues of corruption and bribery whenever their presence is suspected and it is felt necessary to ensure that they have been given due consideration in the course of the proceedings.”
ICC’s first anticorruption initiative dates back to 1975 when the world business organization set up an ad hoc committee on extortion and bribery in international commercial transactions. In the new supplement, Francois Vincke, Vice-Chair of the ICC Commission on Corporate Responsibility and Anti-Corruption, briefs readers on more recent initiatives that have been and are being undertaken, not only by ICC but also by other international organizations, to combat corruption, and the impact of those initiatives on arbitration. These include the launch of ICC’s anti-corruption clause in 2012 and the publication in 2013 of the ICC Ethics and Compliance Training Handbook, which are intended to help equip companies with the necessary in-house expertise to build ethics and compliance systems commensurate with their needs.
ICC publications relating to corruption are on sale in the ICC Store
Some are also available online by subscription to the ICC Dispute Resolution Library
Source : ICC